We met with local communities to find out:
- where they like to spend time
- how they move through their suburb
- what areas they want to see protected
- what needs to be improved.
We consulted with the relevant Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs) as we developed our plans.
The purpose of consulting with the RAPs was to seek feedback on planning proposals for these centres, and to identify ways to amplify the significance of Aboriginal cultural heritage and values through the Train and Tram Zone Activity Centres Program.
As part of our consultation with Traditional Owner groups during the expansion program, we held:
Through this consultation:
The statements are included in the final train and tram zone activity centre plans. The statements elevate understanding of Aboriginal cultural heritage and the ongoing significance of place.
They signal to developers, builders and the wider community the cultural significance of these places to First Peoples.
The Statements of Cultural Values do not represent the full significance of cultural values of the activity centres. This can only be understood through more detailed Cultural Value assessments that involve On Country walks and traditional knowledge recording.
We received more than 26,000 survey responses and submissions throughout the Train and Tram Zone Activity Centres Program's development.
Feedback has been critical in shaping Train and Tram Zone Activity Centre Plans, with community views and insights directly influencing how the plans respond to local priorities and conditions.
We consulted in four distinct phases:
Consultation gave communities an opportunity to learn more about the program as well as provide local insights and feedback.
The consultation objectives were to:
While consultation methods varied depending on the different program phases, they generally included:
We consulted with communities for the 10 pilot activity centres from March to August of 2024.
Consultation during this phase helped shape planning for the pilot centres as well as the future of the full program.
We heard:
For full details about our pilot centres consultation, including key themes and how we addressed them, see the engagement report.
Following consultation for the 10 pilot centres, the program was expanded to a further 50 centres.
Consultation for the next 50 centres occurred in three stages
We consulted with communities in stages 1 and 2 from May 2025 to March 2026.
For stages 1 and 2, we consulted with community across two phases, and facilitated Community Reference Groups for each group of activity centres.
For full details about our consultation, including key themes and how we addressed them, view the engagement report for each group of centres by searching our Resource Library.
Click on the accordions below details abou the different consultation phases and their purpose.
We met with local communities to find out:
Feedback from Phase 1, plus consultation with other key stakeholder groups, helped us develop draft maps for each centre. In this phase, people gave feedback about:
We established Community Reference Groups (CRGs) for each group of activity centres.
There were up to 50 people in each group, representing a diverse range of views and perspectives. The groups reviewed community feedback and developed Statements of Advice for our planning team.
The statements helped us develop our draft maps, together with the planners’ consideration of existing council strategic work, site visits, technical studies and urban design testing.
You can find the Statement of Advice for each centre on individual activity centres page by searching the Resource Library.
For full details about our expansion program consultation, including key themes and how we addressed them, search for the consultation report for your activity centre in the Resource Library.
The two Inner Melbourne train and tram zones are:
We consulted on these two zones from May to June 2026.
People contributed by:
For details about our inner Melbourne consultation, view the Inner Melbourne Train and Tram Zone webpage.
See the figures below to see how many people participated in the program:
A focus of our consultation approach was to reduce barriers for multicultural communities to have their say on the program.
He wanted to hear from a diversity of community members to ensure that feedback captured a range of views and perspectives.
We undertook targeted multicultural consultation in areas with a higher percentage of non-English speaking residents with low English proficiency.
Activities included pop-up stalls at local markets, attending local community centre events, and a multicultural drop-in session, where translators were available.
Translated content was also available in the form of flyers, newspaper ads, radio ads, geo-targeted social media ads, posters, content and surveys on our Engage Victoria webpages. These were tailored to the top languages spoken amongst people with low English proficiency for each of the local areas.
In total, we provided translated information in the following 15 languages:
Other key statistics of our multicultural consultation include:
Councils were a critical stakeholder as we developed our plans.
Throughout the program, we regularly engaged with councils to:
We also worked closely with relevant State government departments and agencies to align planning, transport, infrastructure, and service delivery objectives. Key collaborators included:
While key themes and responses varied among different centres, we nevertheless received consistent feedback. Themes were captured from community, council, Traditional Owners, industry and other stakeholders. Click on each accordion below to find how we responded to these common themes.
For specific themes for individual activity centres, view the consultation reports by searching the Resource Library.
We’re introducing Infrastructure Contribution Plans for each centre. This is to fund infrastructure essential to the liveability of current and future communities.
Statewide planning controls now include items relating to canopy cover. We have also considered and have tailored a response to significant landscape overlays in train and tram zone activity centres.
The planning tools ensure that the character of special places is preserved. We’ve amended core and catchment boundaries to reflect local conditions and walking distances from train stations and tram stops.
In addition to retaining existing heritage overlays, we’ve applied lower heights to large heritage precincts. We’ve also not specified heights on Victoria Heritage Register sites in activity centre cores.
Core building heights have been adjusted, where relevant, in response to feedback, to ensure sun protections for important locations.
The Built Form Overlay and Housing Choice and Transport Zone support site consolidation by allowing for greater development capacity when lots are consolidated in core and catchment areas.
Page last updated: 02/10/26